<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NARA and Anthony Clark; What NARA Can&#8217;t Do, What NARA Must Do, and What NARA Should Do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archivesnext.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=241</link>
	<description>well, what will come next?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:12:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NARA and Anthony Clark, articles to reference. &#171; The Novice Archivist</title>
		<link>http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=241&#038;cpage=1#comment-36607</link>
		<dc:creator>NARA and Anthony Clark, articles to reference. &#171; The Novice Archivist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=241#comment-36607</guid>
		<description>[...] NARA and Anthony Clark; What NARA Can&#8217;t Do, What NARA Must Do and What NARA Should Do. Posted by Kate T., ArchivesNext [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NARA and Anthony Clark; What NARA Can&#8217;t Do, What NARA Must Do and What NARA Should Do. Posted by Kate T., ArchivesNext [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=241&#038;cpage=1#comment-36481</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=241#comment-36481</guid>
		<description>Yeah - I agree, Kate. NARA is not some sort of evil empire just looking for ways to violate FOIA and professional ethics. But people like you and Clark and Richard (and possibly SAA if they step up to the plate) need to continue to pressure them to make their processes more transparent and to adopt a more user-centric model when it comes to compliance with access laws. Even more so, the comments on this blog about the new AUS are important. Commitment to openess starts at the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; I agree, Kate. NARA is not some sort of evil empire just looking for ways to violate FOIA and professional ethics. But people like you and Clark and Richard (and possibly SAA if they step up to the plate) need to continue to pressure them to make their processes more transparent and to adopt a more user-centric model when it comes to compliance with access laws. Even more so, the comments on this blog about the new AUS are important. Commitment to openess starts at the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell D. James, CA</title>
		<link>http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=241&#038;cpage=1#comment-36300</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell D. James, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archivesnext.com/?p=241#comment-36300</guid>
		<description>Absolutely correct, Kate!  I agree with everything you said. 

I have followed up on your excellent reasoning with a post of my own at http://recordsjunkie.blogspot.com detailing what SAA can&#039;t do, can do, and should do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely correct, Kate!  I agree with everything you said. </p>
<p>I have followed up on your excellent reasoning with a post of my own at <a href="http://recordsjunkie.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://recordsjunkie.blogspot.com</a> detailing what SAA can&#8217;t do, can do, and should do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
