You can order Description: Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections from the Rowman & Littlefield site (and save 20% by using the promotional code 7S14ARCH). The Table of Contents is available there, and you can also read the pre-publication reviews from Kathleen Roe and Bill Landis.
To help give you a better idea of what’s in the book, here’s an excerpt from the Introduction: Continue reading
You can order Outreach: Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections from the Rowman & Littlefield site (and save 20% by using the promotional code 7S14ARCH). The Table of Contents is available there, and you can also read the pre-publication reviews from Larry Hackman and Terry Baxter.
To help give you a better idea of what’s in the book, here’s an excerpt from the Introduction:
You can order Reference and Access: Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections from the Rowman & Littlefield site (and save 20% by using the promotional code 7S14ARCH). The Table of Contents is available there, and you can also read the pre-publication reviews from Sharon Thibodeau and Kathy Marquis.
To help give you a better idea of what’s in the book, here’s an excerpt from the Introduction: Continue reading
I hope you’re not unaware of the fact that the first four books in the Innovative Practices in Archives and Special Collections series are now available from Rowman & Littlefield. The publisher has done a rather good job of promoting them, I think, but there’s not a whole lot of information about each title available on their site. So in this post and the four that follow I’ll be sharing some of the text from the introductions for the books to give you some insight into what you can expect from each title. In addition, as you may have seen if you got the publisher’s flier in the mail, there’s a discount code which will save you 20% off the cover price if you order from the R&L site: 7S14ARCH.
In each of the introductions there’s a section in common that addresses what I mean by “innovative practices.” I know that “innovative” is one of those buzzwords that’s used a lot lately, but I think it’s a useful way to describe the content of the books. Besides, the publisher probably wouldn’t have been comfortable with Some Cool Stuff People in Archives and Special Collections are Doing. Here’s what I wrote about the series as a whole:
I debated with myself for some time over the title of this series, “Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections.” After all, what is innovative and new to one person is often standard procedure to another. Another option was to call them best practices and follow the model of a series of similar books from the same publisher featuring case studies from libraries. But this seemed equally problematic. In a field that seems to embrace the phrase it depends as a mantra, putting forward the experience of any one archives as best practice seemed ill advised.
It is the very diversity of our field, though, that caused me to stick with my innovative label rather than shying away from it. There are new ideas in these books, or at least ideas that are new to many readers. My philosophy in selecting case studies for the books in this series has been to keep in mind a broad spectrum of readers and to position the series so that it is as valuable as possible for a diverse audience. In each book are case studies from both big organizations and small ones. Some of the creative ideas presented are being implemented with costly tools and robust infrastructures, and others are being done on a shoestring. In determining what to include, I wanted to ensure that every case study incorporates ideas that are transferrable, even if the specific implementation might not be.
This commitment to making the series broadly valuable and practical has meant striving for a balance that favors more approachable innovations over implementations that are aggressively on the cutting edge. The ideas presented here are within the reach of most archives and special collections, if not right away, then in the near future. They represent the creativity and commitment to serving and expanding our audiences that I think are the defining characteristics of the archival profession in the early twenty-first century.
Because archival functions and processes are interrelated and don’t always fit neatly into compartments and because most archivists perform several of them in the course of their daily work, the contents of each of the volumes in this series has both its own clear focus and overlapping relationships with the others. Case studies in reference and access touch inevitably on description and outreach. Because the overarching purpose of description is to facilitate use, issues relating to reference, access, and outreach are components of the case studies in that volume. The overlap of the management volume with all of the others should not be surprising, though the focus of the case studies there are more explicitly on management issues. These interrelationships are inevitable given the nature of archival work, and most practitioners and students will find all of the volumes useful.
It was a very good year.
Thanks to 120 people, 28 students and 23 regular members will be attending the SAA annual meeting in a happier state of mind. Your donations of $11,210 are funding the registrations of 51 people. Over the previous three years scholarships have been given out to 98 people–so in this one year we’re more than half way toward doubling that number. You have been very generous–and some of you (you know who you are) have been crazy generous.
This year was exceptional also for the high percentage of people we were able to fund. We were able to give money to 28 out of the 42 students who asked, and to an astonishing 23 out of the 37 regular member applicants. So 67% of the people who asked for money were able to receive it. I’m particularly pleased about the number of scholarships for regular members we were able to give this year, considering that at $319 a pop they’re much more expensive than the students ($139).
I also want to recognize two anonymous donors who got into the spirit of the campaign by offering matching donations. The first offered to match all donations made by SAA’s SNAP Roundtable members, up to $1,000. SNAP members met and exceeded that pledge, giving a total of $1926. Another person offered to donate $1 for every donation. I know these two matching pledges encouraged many people to donate something, even if they couldn’t afford much, knowing that it would be doubled (+ $1). Anyone who wants to consider doing something similar next year, let me know!
So over the past four years, together we’ve raised over $31,700 and helped 149 colleagues. For that, all donors, over all the four years, deserve thanks. But clearly this year was phenomenal. If you’ve donated, I’ve already thanked you, so I hope some of people who’ve benefited from your kindness will thank you themselves in the comments below. If you got a scholarship this year, or any year, please take a minute and share your appreciation and how much this assistance means to you. I’m lucky enough to see all the happy messages people send when I let them know they’ve been picked. Please share some of that with the supportive and lovely people who send in the money!
A quick update: The first round of names were picked from the hat and the winners notified on Monday. If your name was pulled, an email was sent to you on Monday morning. A few people have not responded yet to accept the scholarships and as the message says, there’s a deadline for getting back to me. We’ll also be pulling more names out tonight (since we have more donations) and I’ll notify another batch of people, and again, you need to get back to me and accept the offer. So basically, if you applied for a scholarship, please make sure you’re checking your email this week.
Feel free to keep donating via the Paypal link on the site for the next few days, and I’ll post a final update with all the numbers once we’re done giving away the donations.
But please, if someone you know applied for a scholarship let them know to keep an eye on his or her email account!
With about ten days to go in this year’s campaign, we have some great news to share. I am delighted to announce that SAA has honored me with this year’s Spotlight Award for the Spontaneous Scholarships. This award recognizes “the contributions of individuals who work for the good of the profession and archives collections—work that does not typically receive public recognition.” Regular readers will have no doubt about how the scholarships benefit the profession, but if you’d like to read the SAA statement accompanying the award, it’s available here. (You may also browse the full list of award recipients here. It’s worth spending some time learning about the work of these great people and organizations.)
My deepest thanks to those responsible for nominating me, and, of course, there are no scholarships without the donors, so heartfelt thanks to all of you who have made this program continue to be successful over the years.
And speaking of donors … we now have 76 of them. So the generous donor who volunteered to contribute $1 for every contributor will have to dig a bit deeper. Can we push him/her to a $100 donation?I think we can. We’ve already succeeded in meeting the pledge to match all donations by SNAP Roundtable members, up to $1,000, so thanks to all the members of SNAP who have made donations, big and small.
This morning’s tally of donations stands at $6,360. We now have 33 student applicants and 27 people who will be registering at the full SAA member rate, which means we currently have enough to fund 48.2% of the applicant pool. That’s certainly very good, but as you might expect there is usually a last minute rush of names being thrown into the virtual hat, so I cannot feel complacent. With things wrapping up on June 27, there’s still a lot of time for people to donate and apply. If you need information about how to do either, here’s the original announcement post. (You’ll also notice the Donate button at the upper left hand side. Convenient, isn’t it?)
As always, please help spread the word to those who might be able to contribute or who could use a little help. Give if you can, ask if you need!
With just a little over two weeks to go for the Spontaneous Scholarships, we have raised about $5,100, with ~$700 in so far from SNAP Roundtable members eligible for the matching pledge. That money has come from 54 individual donors, which means a matching donation of at least $54 so far from the other matching pledge. So that’s all very good. At around this time last year I was concerned because we were so far behind the previous year’s rate of donations. We’ve had several large donations already this year, which warms the cockles of my heart, but all donations are good donations. If you want the cockles of your heart warmed, maybe you want to read the post I put up a few days ago, with messages from donors.
But what’s the status of the hat? We have the names of 29 student registrants and 24 at the regular member rate. So we’d need $11,687 to fund everyone we currently have. Of course, the plan isn’t to fund everyone who asks, but I’d like to get closer to at least 50% if we can. (As you might expect, the number of names in the hat rises every year. At this time last year we had 22 students and 19 regulars.)
I’m hoping to see enough donations from SNAP members over the next few weeks so we make that pledge to match up to $1,000, and I’m also hoping we can get closer to funding about half the people who have asked for help. Bear in mind that we usually get a last minute rush of applicants near the deadline after I remind people that the end is near. So if you haven’t donated yet, I hope you will do so. I’m hesitant to post with such positive news for fear it will make people think we’re all set, but in the interests of transparency, this is where we’re at right now. We’re in pretty good shape, but we always need more. As always, give if you can, ask if you need!
I’ve been tardy about posting this, so if you’re interested, jump on it quickly!
No apologies for cross-posting. This announcement is awesome and everyone should read it, preferably multiple times.
Raiders of the Lost Archives was a series of musical comedy performances presented at SAA and MAC in the 80′s and 90′s. We’ll be resurrecting the tradition Friday night at SAA 2014
, and we need your help! If you can sing, act, write, direct, play an instrument, or otherwise contribute to a performance, we’d love to have you. Even if you can’t–we’re not picky.
Here’s how to get involved:
Please feel free to email me off-list if you have any questions, and I look forward to seeing you at SAA!
Rebecca Goldman, Raiders co-wrangler
As I said last night on Twitter, running the Spontaneous Scholarships allows me to see a very positive and supportive side of the archival profession, which although we all know it exists, we sometimes don’t see as much of as we’d like. One aspect of this is that although everyone knows that the donations are primarily about the money, I also get to see that the opportunity to give back or pay it forward provides donors a direct and tangible way to show their support for others. I also get to hear from people asking for help that even if they don’t get lucky and have their name pulled out of the hat, just knowing that other archivists want to help them makes them feel like others in the profession care. But you don’t have to take my word for it. Below are some excerpts from notes and a selection of tweets that show how people feel about the program. And after you read them and get inspired, donate if you can.